Should You Wait Until 70 to Claim Social Security Benefits?

The data justifies waiting to claim Social Security benefits for many Americans.

Over 50 years ago, preschoolers at Stanford’s Bing Nursery School were given a choice. They could either eat one marshmallow immediately or wait 20 minutes and get two marshmallows. The kids were then tracked for decades. The ones who waited fared better in multiple ways, including higher SAT scores and increased self-worth.

American adults nearing retirement face their own version of the marshmallow test. They can claim benefits early at age 62. They can wait until their full retirement age. Or they can wait until age 70. The longer the wait, the higher the benefits.

It might seem like a no-brainer to push back as long as possible. But should you really wait until 70 to claim Social Security benefits? Here’s what the statistics show.

The advantage of waiting
Let’s assume you steadily earned the level for maximum Social Security benefits throughout your career and opted to claim your benefits at age 62 in January 2022. Your monthly retirement benefit would be $2,364, according to the Social Security Administration (SSA).

Now, let’s suppose you wait to age 67 to claim benefits. Your monthly check would increase to $3,568. However, if you chose to delay claiming Social Security benefits until age 70, you’d receive a whopping $4,194 per month.

This isn’t as great of a deal as the preschoolers getting twice as many marshmallows by waiting 20 minutes. However, there’s clearly a financial advantage to delaying when you claim Social Security retirement benefits.

Your monthly check will be nearly 51% higher by waiting to claim Social Security benefits until age 67 compared to doing so at age 62. If you wait until age 70, your monthly check will be over 17.5% higher compared to claiming benefits at age 67.

Do statistics work against delaying?
So is delaying until age 70 to claim Social Security benefits a smart move? It’s true that you’ll receive a higher monthly check if you wait. However, it’s important to look at what your cumulative benefits will be.


DATA SOURCE: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION. CALCULATIONS AND CHART BY AUTHOR.

The above chart shows the cumulative benefits by age for claiming Social Security at ages 62, 67, and 70. Note that the calculations use the maximum Social Security benefit amounts mentioned earlier.

At age 76, the cumulative benefits for claiming at age 67 will exceed those for claiming at age 62. At age 87, the cumulative benefits for claiming at age 72 will top those for claiming at age 67.

Now for arguably the most important statistics. The average lifespan for men in the U.S. is 75. It’s 81 for women. Based on this, many Americans won’t be better off waiting until age 70 to claim Social Security benefits because they won’t live long enough for it to pay off.

However, there’s more to the story. For Americans who live to age 65, the average life expectancy is another 19.1 years for males and another 21.7 years for females. This changes the decision-making dynamics.

We haven’t factored in the time value of money, though. Even if you didn’t need Social Security benefits at age 67, you could claim them and invest the money in a low-risk alternative such as Treasury bonds. Doing so would push out how long it would take to justify delaying claiming benefits even further.

You’re not a statistic
Does this analysis absolutely mean that you should or shouldn’t hold off on claiming Social Security benefits? No. You’re not a statistic.

You could enjoy a much longer life than the average life expectancy. It’s possible that you’ll be able to rake in far more total benefits from Social Security by waiting to claim benefits than you would have by claiming benefits at an earlier age. But maybe you won’t.

Regardless of what your decision is, go ahead and eat a couple of marshmallows if you’d like. There’s no psychologist watching.

— Keith Speights

46-Year-Old CEO Bets $44.2 Billion on One Stock [sponsor]
Netflix is NOT the future of entertainment. It's only a small fraction. And one billionaire CEO is taking charge of what Netflix DOESN'T do and leading the way for the next generation of entertainment. His forward-thinking company, which many people haven't even heard of yet, doesn't only want to compete with Netflix... It wants to rule the world...

Source: The Motley Fool