Mature, prosperous nations are like rich old men.
When they were young, poor, and hungry for success, they had little to lose and everything to prove. So they worked, risked, and managed their way to a fortune.
Now old and rich, they have much to lose, nothing to prove, and tend to avoid risk-taking.
Think Ebenezer Scrooge. He started out as an ambitious yet carefree young man and wound up rich, stingy, and bitter (before Jacob Marley and the three spirits showed up, of course).
Economist and author Todd Buchholz’s 2016 book, The Price of Prosperity: Why Rich Nations Fail and How to Renew Them, addresses this tendency of rich nations to fail due not to economic failure, but to the problems brought about by economic success.
The “price of prosperity” dynamic also influences successful companies. Their success attracts younger, smarter, hungrier competitors who are only too eager to take all the risks and make all the decisions that the established businesses are too scared to make.
I’ve been warning investors about this since 2017. As I’ve said, the greatest businesses in the world can generate poor returns or even big losses.
And you don’t have to go far back in time to see how such businesses – and their shareholders – paid dearly for the prosperity they generated…
The five largest stocks by market cap on March 31, 2000 – the peak of the dot-com bubble – were General Electric (GE), Cisco Systems (CSCO), ExxonMobil (XOM), Pfizer (PFE), and Microsoft (MSFT).
Back then, everybody thought they were the most fantastic businesses in the world. They were the safe, blue-chip, “no-brainers”… They were “one decision stocks” because the only decision you needed to make was to buy them – with no need for deep, fundamental research – and, by implication, never even consider selling them.
Reality proved those ideas wrong. All five companies were decimated when the bubble popped. Peak to trough, GE fell 63%, Cisco fell 89%, ExxonMobil fell 36%, Pfizer fell 48%, and Microsoft fell 64%.
Microsoft finally eclipsed its dot-com highs after 17 years. But the other four have yet to break even… two decades later.
These companies have paid for their former prosperity by generating disappointing results and disappointing investment returns…
For example, GE – now a shadow of its former self – fell so far from grace that one famous analyst called it “a bigger fraud than Enron.” The manipulations that helped GE generate steadily rising earnings and a rising stock price also sowed the seeds of its inevitable downfall. The financial results weren’t nearly as good as the company had reported for several years. The market found out about it, and the stock tanked.
Cisco, ExxonMobil, and Pfizer are still good businesses that have offered chances to profit over the past 20 years – but they have not lived up to the “one decision” promise.
It’s one thing to pick five stocks and only have one of them do very well. That’s a rather typical outcome. But it’s another thing entirely to dub five businesses “the best on Earth” and proclaim them riskless bets on the future of the global economy – then mostly get it wrong.
The dot-com-era doubters were mostly right. I suspect today’s doubters will be proven right sooner rather than later, too. And you can count me among them.
The price-of-prosperity dynamic is bearing down hard on the most successful companies of our era…
I’m talking about companies like Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), Microsoft, Facebook (FB), and Tesla (TSLA).
These are the no-brainers and one-decision stocks of today. They’re the ones nobody questions. They’re the businesses everybody and their brother believes will deliver stellar results and investment returns forever.
When the COVID-19 pandemic hit our shores back in February and March, investor and writer Howard Marks’ proverbial “pendulum of investor psychology” careened toward extreme pessimism. Investors wanted out of stocks, and panic selling ensued.
Now, the pendulum of investor psychology has swung to the other extreme…
Our research indicates the gap between expectations and stock fundamentals has narrowed so much that most businesses are now trading at, or even above, their intrinsic value estimates. (Intrinsic value is an estimate of the highest price a business would likely command, based on its future free cash flow generation.)
When businesses are widely trading near intrinsic value, their upside potential is limited. This is particularly true of the largest tech stocks comprising the Nasdaq 100 Index. That index has soared 90% since its March 2020 low, beating the S&P 500 by 19 percentage points.
In other words, today’s tech darlings are leading the mania. Expectations are high. And we must prepare for the possibility of a significant move lower.
Investors in big tech names like Apple and Amazon are doing today what they’ve done for much of the past decade: assuming the next several years will look a lot like the recent past.
Generating strong top-line growth year after year while also maintaining solid margins is no small feat. The fact that many big tech names have been able to accomplish this explains why they’ve been exceptional investments over the past decade.
Just don’t expect it to last forever…
— Dan FerrisStrange change at your bank [sponsor]
At least 41 major US banks have just made a drastic change to the way money in America works. It could have some major implications for you, your money and your retirement. But it's crucial you understand what's happening, before these changes get applied to your bank account. Here's everything you need to know.
Source: Daily Wealth