Energy Transfer (NYSE: ET) is a favorite of income-seeking investors due to the stock’s strong distribution yield. (Energy Transfer is a master limited partnership, or MLP. MLPs pay distributions, not dividends.)
Now, thanks to the collapse in anything oil-related, the stock yields a whopping 15.7%.
But can investors bank on continuing to receive the distribution?
Energy Transfer’s cash available for distribution (CAD), a measure of cash flow for MLPs, had been steadily rising, but it is expected to take a detour lower this year.
SafetyNet Pro does not like to see cash flow declining. It takes that offense very seriously and will penalize a company’s rating because if the slide continues, the company could see its distribution become unaffordable.
Energy Transfer also has a lot of debt. Its debt-to-EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) ratio is 5.94. That’s a hefty debt load to support, especially if cash flow is declining.
On the positive side, the company’s payout ratio is low. Last year, it paid out just 39% of CAD in distributions. Due to the lower CAD expected this year, the payout ratio will likely climb to 59%, which is still an acceptable level.
Energy Transfer has a solid distribution-paying history. It has raised the distribution many times since it began paying one in 2006, although it doesn’t do so every year. The last raise was in 2017. It has never cut the distribution in its 15-year history of paying investors.
The two issues affecting Energy Transfer’s dividend safety rating are its declining cash flow and high debt level.
The debt probably won’t be resolved anytime soon, but next year, if cash flow rebounds, so should Energy Transfer’s dividend safety rating.
I’m not expecting a cut.
However, the company could reduce the distribution by half and it would still have a very attractive yield of nearly 8%.
So if Energy Transfer did lower the distribution, it wouldn’t be a total shock.
Dividend Safety Rating: C
MarcHow in the World Did the CEO of a $3 Stock Do This?? [sponsor]
He made a $450 million deal with Nokia... a $395 million deal with Microsoft... an $828 million deal with Cisco... and a $29.26 BILLION deal with Apple. How did the CEO of a stock trading for just $3 do it? And just how high will the stock go as a result? The incredible story here.
Source: Wealthy Retirement