The 3 Most Dangerous Words in Investing

The common cliché on Wall Street is that the four most dangerous words in investing are, “This time is different.”

But I’ve found a three-word phrase that’s uttered just as frequently… and is arguably even more dangerous.

“I missed it.”

You’ve probably grumbled these words before. Especially if you’ve ever passed on a stock you were considering buying… then watched as it marched to new high after new high.

The thing is, a great run higher doesn’t necessarily mean it’s too late to buy.

Today, I’ll show you why this simple, three-word phrase can be so misleading…

In my decades as a value investor, I’ve seen it time and time again.

Value investors like me tend to look in the bargain bin for beaten-up stocks that are trading at 52-week (if not multiyear) lows. They get a sense of satisfaction from getting a better deal than the guy who bought it a month or a year ago.

It’s a great strategy if – and this is a big if – you can correctly identify companies whose fundamentals turn around. The key here is to avoid value traps: the companies that never turn around, and thus their profits (and stocks) keep falling and falling…

But what about stocks that never really fall out of favor and end up in the bargain bin? We value investors often miss them.

Take Alphabet (GOOGL). In August 2004, the company went public at a split-adjusted $42.50 a share. By October, the price had already more than doubled. A year after that, it had doubled again. And two years after that – in October 2007 – shares were trading at $355. Today, they’re up to around $1,200.

Sure, it would be great to have bought as soon as it went public. You’d be sitting on gains of more than 2,800% today. But even if you didn’t buy on day one, you didn’t miss it.

Heck, if you had sucked your thumb for a year, watched the stock go up 300%, and bought shares in October 2005, you still could have doubled your money in only two years…

If you made this mistake, well, join the crowd. I watched Google’s shares go from $50… to $100… to $150… to $200… to $250… (You get the point.)

It would be one thing if I had done the work on it and concluded that it was outside my circle of competence (it wasn’t) or was too expensive (it wasn’t).

But that wasn’t the case. I simply didn’t do the work. Why? It’s not because I was lazy. Rather, every time I looked at the stock, it was usually trading at or near an all-time high, so I kept telling myself, “I missed it” and moved on. If I had just bought what I knew was a great business at any of those points, I’d be sitting on a multi-bagger today.

Let me give you another example. My friend Chris Stavrou, who runs Stavrou Partners – a family office based out of New York – bought shares of Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A), back when he was a stockbroker in the 1970s.

He started buying it for his clients around $400 a share – after it had risen more than 2,000% over the previous decade. But Chris didn’t fall into the “I missed it” trap.

A decade later, he opened up his own hedge fund. By then, Berkshire was trading at an all-time high of $1,800 a share.

So did he say to himself, “Wow, this stock has moved up a lot – I think I’ll wait for a pullback” or “Drat, I missed it”? No. He saw that it was a great company run by a brilliant investor and the stock was still attractive at $1,800. So he bought it for his nascent fund – and still owns those shares today, each valued at more than $300,000!

So learn this lesson well: Whether a stock is trading at a 10-year low or a 10-year high tells you absolutely nothing about whether it’s cheap or expensive. Some stocks trading at multiyear lows are horrible value traps that are headed to zero. And some stocks trading at multiyear highs are going to be spectacular winners going forward.

The lesson here is, don’t fall into the “I missed it” trap. Ignore where the stock price has been, do the work, and make a rational decision based on your assessment of where the stock is likely to go in the future.


Whitney Tilson

Legendary Stock-Picker Predicts Next 1,000% Stock [sponsor]
34-yr-old Matt McCall made history when he predicted five 1,000% winners on national TV. Now he's doing it all over again. Over the past decade, he's found 18 recommendations that soared 1,000% or more. And he just went public with what he predicts will be his next 1,000% winner. If you've ever wondered how legendary investors find stocks that shoot up 10X - and how you can do it too - click here.

Source: Daily Wealth