I began this Dividend Growth Stock of the Month series at the beginning of last year. Here are the stocks covered so far this year:
|Month, 2016||Company||Ticker||Article Link|
The very first stock in the series, back in January 2015, was the communications giant AT&T (T). This month, we will take a look at its largest competitor: Verizon Communications (VZ). This is a stock that I am seriously considering for my wife’s and my retirement portfolio as well as for my public Dividend Growth Portfolio.
Verizon’s Dividend Characteristics
Overall this is a good resume. Highlights include:
• Very high yield of 4.5%. This is more than double the S&P 500’s yield. The average yield of all 790 Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers is 2.9%.
• Payout ratio from earnings (64%) is OK. The payout ratio from cash flow (about 40%) is even lower.
• Dividend growth record is steady but slow. This year’s increase will be 2.2% (payable in October). The 5-year dividend growth rate has been 3% per year. Slow dividend growth is the flip side of Verizon’s high yield. Often dividend growth companies with high yields have slow growth rates, and vice-versa.
- Strong dividend safety ratings from both services that I track (see DGI Lesson 17).
The following chart shows Verizon’s 10-year price and dividend history. It illustrates how much noise there is in the stock’s price compared to its dividend payouts.
This lack of noise in the dividend signal is true of most dividend growth stocks, and it is one of the reasons that I employ the dividend growth strategy. Price reflects market opinion and trading; dividends reflect what the company is actually doing.
This chart shows VZ’s share count over the past 10 years.
The graph does not show the declining share count that we normally prefer. However, I don’t see the issuance of shares in 2014 as a particular concern. They issued the shares to raise money for an important acquisition. The issuance came after several years when VZ’s price climbed significantly. That suggests that they got relatively good value for the new shares.
Business Model and Quality
Verizon provides wireline and wireless telephone and broadband data services to more than 112 million retail connections nationwide. It is the largest wireless provider in the country.
But it is not a duopoly.
The wireless market has strong competition.
Besides the two leaders, companies such as Sprint, T-Mobile, and U.S. Cellular provide vigorous competition.
The US market is highly penetrated.
Verizon also serves the Internet market through its wireline broadband offerings (FiOS).
While FiOS is a successful product, the wireline-Internet market is slowly shrinking due to competition from other technologies such as cable and (of course) wireless itself.
In 2014, Verizon paid $130 billion to European telecom Vodafone (VOD) for full ownership of Verizon Wireless. Verizon now carries a high amount of long-term debt on its balance sheet, partly due to that purchase. And we saw above that Verizon’s share count increased significantly at the same time.
The upside to the deal is that Verizon Wireless is a cash machine. According to Verizon’s investor relations department, Verizon Wireless is the largest and most profitable wireless carrier in the country. Take a look at Verizon’s free cash flow, which shows the amount of cash the company generates from its operations after deducting money spent on capital expenditures.
[Source: Simply Safe Dividends]
Note the overall growth trend. The amount per share dropped in 2014 after the company issued new shares (discussed above), but the cash flow immediately began to grow again the following year.
The significance of the cash flow is that Verizon is able to finance its operations and capital needs, and still has enough to pay billions of dollars in dividends to shareholders.
This graph from Trefis shows how big a portion of Verizon’s total business is dependent on wireless.
Verizon Wireless provides about 75% of Verizon’s revenue, and per the Trefis graph contributes 92% of VZ’s value. Verizon Wireless is considered to be the industry leader in coverage and quality. Customers trust Verizon’s network reliability and performance: The percentage of customers who left the company for a competitor’s service stood at an industry low of < 1% last year.
You have undoubtedly seen the many ads touting VZ’s network’s coverage, clarity, and the like. The company has developed and maintained a consistent brand message about its network. Forbes ranks Verizon’s brand as #21 most valuable in the world.
Verizon constantly increases the density of its network. In 2015, VZ invested more than $11 billion not only to meet surging demand for wireless data and video, but also to get the network ready for 5G wireless technology. The network covers 98% of the US, and VZ has spent more than $111 billion since 2000 on it.
In 2015, Verizon invested approximately $28 billion in spectrum licenses and capital for future network capacity. Verizon’s wireless network, technical know-how, and strong brand image provide an economic moat against competitors.
This chart shows how devices connected to VZ’s network grow quarter by quarter – 2 million more devices in Q2 2016 alone. About 86% of devices are now smartphones, and about 96% of those use 4G LTE technology, which in turn drives increased data and video usage.
Verizon’s wireline business provides about 25% of revenue. The company has been selling off pieces of this fading business for years. It competes with cable companies for Internet access, phone, and television customers, and it will not be a driver of future growth.
Verizon’s strategy for future growth is centered on three areas:
• Internet of Things
• Digital advertising
The Internet of Things refers to the growing number of devices, appliances, vehicles, controllers, and other “things” that are connected to the internet.
5G – the next generation of wireless technology – is expected to lead to a huge new set of products. Verizon states that the benefits of 5G technology include high-speed data (30 to 50 times faster than 4G) and greatly improved quality.
The company also believes that 5G will be the foundation for creating more internet-connected devices, making cities smarter, energy grids more efficient, and transportation safer. Verizon intends to begin trials of 5G rollout this year with full deployment shortly thereafter.
Digital advertising will come from the provision of content. This is a new area for Verizon. In 2015, Verizon spent $4 billion to acquire AOL, and earlier this year it agreed to a $4.8 billion purchase of several operating assets from Yahoo. The deal will close in early 2017.
These acquisitions will move Verizon into content such as finance, news, and sports, along with which will come digital advertising technology and opportunities. The acquisition of Yahoo will bring more than 1 billion monthly active users, 600 million of which are on mobile. The AOL and Yahoo acquisitions will help diversify Verizon’s revenue from telecommunications, which is more commoditized and almost utility-like.
It is too early to see whether the move into content and digital advertising will be a successful growth strategy. Currently, the revenue from these initiatives is tiny compared to Verizon’s business as a whole.
Note: I did not see a specific explanation in the S&P Capital IQ report about why it rates Verizon’s business quality as “below average.” In its notes, S&P states this about its quality grades: “Growth and stability of earnings and dividends are deemed key elements in establishing S&P Capital IQ’s earnings and dividend rankings for common stocks, which are designed to capsulize the nature of this record in a single symbol.”
Verizon has an extremely high ROE (return on equity) of 86%. I usually consider anything around 12%-15% or more to be attractive.
That’s the good news. The bad news is that it is largely a result of extremely high debt. Per Morningstar, VZ’s D/E (debt to equity) ratio has risen from 1.4 in 2012 to 4.8 in the most recent quarter. For comparison, the average D/E ratio for all Dividend Champions, Contenders, and Challengers is 1.08.
You can see the jump in ROE when Verizon increased its debt load in 2014 in the following chart. Prior to 2014, Verion’s ROE had been running in the 10% range.
The company has indicated an intention to reduce its debt to levels similar to those it had prior to 2014 by the 2018-2019 time-frame.
Verizon’s earnings per share (EPS) growth over the past 5 years has been a high 37% (as of the end of 2015), but that is a little misleading based on the particular timeframe. The EPS growth rate has actually jumped around a bit. This year EPS is expected to drop by 2%, and next year it is expected to rise by 3%.
Analyst consensus estimates of 3-5 year earnings growth are around 3% per year.
Overall, Verizon’s financial picture is a mixed bag. The best things about it are its consistent cash flow performance and its ROE. The negatives are slow growth and high debt.
Verizon’s Stock Valuation
My 4-step process for valuing companies is described in Dividend Growth Investing Lesson 11: Valuation.
Step 1: FASTGraphs Default. The first step is to compare the stock’s current price to FASTGraphs’ basic estimate of its fair value.
That is usually based on a price-to-earnings ratio (P/E) of 15, which is the long-term average P/E of the stock market as a whole.
However, FASTGraph’s estimate of the next two years’ earnings growth just 0.5% per year. Therefore, the software lowers the fair-value line in this case from 15.0 to 13.2, shown as the orange line on the following chart.
By this first method of appraising valuation, Verizon is fairly priced. Its actual price (the black line) is basically right on the orange fair-value line.
The current price equates to a P/E of 13.1 compared to the “fair” valuation of 13.2. So the exact fair-value price would be 13.2 / 13.1 x $51.49, or $51.88. I round that to $52.
Step 2: FASTGraphs Normalized. The second valuation step is to compare Verizon’s price to its own long-term average P/E ratio. This lets us adjust for the fact that some stocks always seem to have a high valuation, while others always seem to have have a low valuation.
On this graph, we can see that Verizon looks a little undervalued by this method of appraisal. Its 10-year P/E average has been 15.3, compared to its actual current P/E of 13.1.
Using the ratio of P/Es, I calculate a fair value of $60. VZ’s actual price is about 14% under that right now.
Step 3: Morningstar Star Rating. Morningstar uses a comprehensive discounted cash flow (DCF) process for valuation. Many investors consider this approach to be the best method of assessing fair valuations.
Morningstar makes a projection of all the company’s future profits. The sum of all those profits is discounted back to the present to reflect the time value of money. The resulting net present value of all future earnings is considered to be the fair price for the stock today.
On Morningstar’s 5-star system, Verizon gets 3 stars. That means that they believe the company is fairly valued at its current price. They calculate a fair value of $50.
Step 4: Current Yield vs. Historical Yield.
Finally, we compare the stock’s current yield to its historical yield. It is better to be near the top of that range than the bottom.
Verizon is fairly valued by this method as well. Its current yield of 4.5% is just under its 5-year average yield of 4.6% (per Morningstar).
The ratio of those two yields suggests a fair value of $50.
In computing valuations, I consider prices within 10% of the calculated fair value to be within the fair value range. Assessing valuation is inherently imprecise, so rounding prices to the nearest dollar and using sensible ranges is, in my opinion, better than trying to achieve false precision.
Using the 4 approaches just described, our valuation summary for Cisco looks like this:
For a reality check, I also looked at S&P Capital IQ’s valuation analysis. Their 12-month price target for Verizon is $56, and they have a 3-star “hold” rating on the stock.
There are a couple of factors that do not fall into the earlier categories.
Beta measures a stock’s price volatility relative to the market as a whole. Most dividend growth investors like to own stocks with low volatility, because then you are less likely to become emotional about them when their price drops.
Verizon has one of the lowest betas that I have seen. At 0.2 over the past 5 years, Verizon’s price has moved only 20% as much as the market.
The analysts’ recommendations come from S&P Capital IQ. Their most recent report on Verizon shows the opinions of 30 analysts. Their average recommendation is 3.4 on a 5-point scale, where 3.0 = Hold and 4.0 = Buy. In other words, their average recommendation is a little better than “hold.”
Here are Verizon’s positives:
• High yield at 4.5%.
• Strong dividend safety, protected by very good cash flow.
• Stock is fairly valued or maybe a little undervalued.
• Wireless network is strong in both image and performance. Company continually investing to improve it.
• Negligible customer churn.
• High return on equity, but offset by high debt load.
• Decent financials: Steady slow-growing company that provides what has become a necessity in modern life. Recurring revenue with steady flow of cash.
• Very low price volatility.
Here are Verizon’s negatives:
• High degreee of business competition.
• Capital-intensive business model.
• High debt load since 2014.
As always, do your own due diligence, and please do not take this article as a recommendation to buy or hold Verizon. Instead, use it to inspire your own research and diligence. Always invest with an eye to your tolerance for price volatility and in a manner that advances your goals.
— Dave Van Knapp[ad#IPM-article]